You\u2019ve just hired an entry-level employee and, to avoid all the hassle of tracking hours and paying overtime, you\u2019ve decided to put your new hire on salary. Well, guess what? You may very well have violated the law.<\/p>\n
While we often use the terms \u201chourly\u201d and \u201csalaried\u201d to designate an employee\u2019s payroll status, there is a much more important consideration, and that is the employee\u2019s legal status. Referred to as \u201cexempt\u201d or \u201cnonexempt,\u201d this designation dictates how the employee can be paid, and whether he or she is eligible for overtime.<\/p>\n
Established in 1938, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) governs many foundations of employment law, including minimum wage, overtime, minimum age for workers, calculation of time worked, deductions from pay, and recordkeeping requirements. The terms \u201cexempt\u201d and \u201cnonexempt\u201d mean that an employee is either exempt or not exempt from the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the law.<\/p>\n
Assessing whether an employee qualifies as exempt can be tricky, and according to the Department of Labor, most employees do not meet the criteria.<\/p>\n
So, how is the determination made? Let\u2019s first look at nonexempt, or what most of us think of as \u201chourly\u201d employees. From a legal perspective, even if their pay is high enough to qualify as exempt (see below), you can\u2019t go wrong treating them as nonexempt because by doing so you are ensuring they are paid at least minimum wage and receive time-and-a-half for more than 40 hours in a week, thus meeting the key concerns of the law.<\/p>\n
In addition, while most nonexempt employees are paid hourly, there is no legal requirement to do so, and you can still pay them a salary as long as you track the employee\u2019s hours (although the calculation for determining overtime can get tricky.) So, in other words, you can pay your nonexempt employees a salary as long as you track their actual time and assure the employee is receiving proper minimum wage and overtime pay.<\/p>\n
On the flip side of the law is classifying an employee as exempt, and for this there are extensive (although not always straightforward) guidelines to ensure a proper designation and treatment. It is not a matter of the employer\u2019s preference or convenience. Instead, an employee must pass both a salary test and a duties test to qualify as exempt. The salary test sets minimum requirements for what an exempt employee is paid; the duties test establishes criteria for what an exempt employee does.<\/p>\n
Salary Test<\/p>\n
Whereas a nonexempt employee does not have to be paid on an hourly basis, in most cases an exempt employee must be paid on a salary basis and must receive a guaranteed salary each week. And that salary cannot be reduced based on quality or quantity of work. In fact, there are very few scenarios where an exempt employee\u2019s salary can be docked.<\/p>\n
The key element, and one that is in the spotlight at present, is the minimum level of pay that federal regulations require before an employer can make an employee exempt. Right now, an exempt employee must be paid at least $455\/week ($23,660\/year) \u2013 anything below that requires that the employee be designated non-exempt and thereby paid overtime for work exceeded 40 hours per week. But big changes are coming! The Department of Labor has established a new salary minimum so effective December 1, 2016, the new salary minimum will be $913\/week ($47,476\/year). At that level, even if you have an employee who passes the duties test (below) to be exempt, you may not want to treat them as exempt because you may not want (or be able) to pay the minimum required in order to pass the salary test.<\/p>\n
Duties Test<\/p>\n
In addition to the salary test, a potentially exempt employee must also pass the duties test. To make this determination, the Department of Labor developed the \u201cWhite Collar Exemptions.\u201d To qualify as exempt, an employee\u2019s primary duties only have to meet the standards in one of the following categories:<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Executive: Management of the organization or a customarily recognized department or division. This is true management, not usually a working supervisor, based on actual duties and level of bona fide, independent management authority, and not on job title alone.<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Administrative: High level office or non-manual work directly related to management or general operations (such as Accounting, IT, HR, Marketing) and including the exercise of independent judgment and decision-making discretion on matters of significance.<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Professional: Work requiring advanced knowledge in science or other field of learning customarily obtained by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction, i.e., higher education (not vocational education). In other words, much of the knowledge required is typically learned by going to college, not on-the-job.<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Computer: Design, development, creation, testing, and modification of computer systems and programs. This does not apply to help desk employees and roles involved in the manufacture, operation, repair, or maintenance of computers. Exempt computer professionals may, in lieu of passing the salary test, be paid by the hour if they make at least $27.63 per hour.<\/p>\n
\u00b7 Outside Sales: Making sales or obtaining orders or contracts, and work is largely performed away from the employer\u2019s premises, i.e., cold-calling, identifying and visiting prospects, etc. Insides sales and customer service positions typically do not qualify. Bona fide outside sales professionals do not have to meet the salary test.<\/p>\n
The vast majority of employees do not meet the criteria to be exempt and should be treated as nonexempt. A favorite focus of the Department of Labor (DOL), penalties for misclassification are steep, including back pay with interest for up to three years, liquidated damages, and criminal penalties and imprisonment.<\/p>\n
And one word of caution: many of our small business clients with misclassified employees feel they are unlikely to be audited and therefore don\u2019t worry about this lapse in compliance. Don\u2019t make this mistake \u2013 you are only as safe as your last bad hire. And if a disgruntled employee feels he or she should have been eligible for overtime, you face an elevated risk that the DOL will come a knockin\u2019.<\/p>\n
By Charlotte Jensen, Vice President, HR Compliance, Affinity HR Group<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
You\u2019ve just hired an entry-level employee and, to avoid all the hassle of tracking hours and paying overtime, you\u2019ve decided to put your new hire on salary. Well, guess what? You may very well have violated the law. While we often use the terms \u201chourly\u201d and \u201csalaried\u201d to designate an employee\u2019s payroll status, there is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7492","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"aioseo_notices":[],"yoast_head":"\n